2 days ago · It featured a more powerful AMD Polaris GPU, a 31% faster CPU than the original PS4, and increased memory bandwidth. Overall, the PS4 Pro pushed exclusive titles to a higher resolution display and gave 4K TV owners a more vibrant gaming experience. READ MORE: 1080p vs. 1080i: Understanding The Differences Between Video Resolutions
The switch isn't a powerhouse, but it's powerful enough to run modern games. Playing modern games with a full controller scheme and an HD screen on the go is amazing already. As long as the sales keep on coming (which they appear to be), it'll be fully supported and will have plenty of things to do with it. 6. on ps3 you have 8rops@550MHz ->4.4GPixel/s fillrate -> 70GB/s requirement if you could do it the same way the ps2 did, sadly you only have 20GB/s, so you cannot keep up with the ps2. on ps4 you have 32rops@800MHz ->25.6GPixel/s fillrate if you go for hdr/64bit targets, you'd actually need 512GB/s peak. another point: Obviously a fragment of a sentence out of context makes no sense. I just asked if the exponentially more powerful hardware of the PS4, compared to the PS3, means that the PS4 has the potential to last longer. The chip inside the PS4 is actually weaker than the PS3's cell processor. Given that PS5 will be easy to buy at some point in the future xVIO.